MODEL OF STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS BASED ON INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2026-1-20Keywords:
educational management, transformation, education quality, educational institutions, models, management and administrationAbstract
The article examines the theoretical and methodological foundations for developing a strategic model of quality management in general secondary education based on the concept of institutional capacity of educational institutions. The study substantiates the economic and managerial nature of the category “quality of education” as an integrated indicator of the effectiveness of the educational system, which is formed through the interaction of institutional resources, managerial competencies, and strategic planning mechanisms. Particular attention is given to the transformation of traditional administrative approaches to education management in the context of modern socio-economic challenges, decentralization of governance, and the expansion of institutional autonomy of educational institutions. The research analyzes scientific approaches to defining the concept of educational quality and systematizes the main theoretical interpretations developed in the fields of pedagogy, economics, and public administration. It is argued that educational quality should be considered not only as compliance with educational standards and learning outcomes but also as a strategic management category that reflects the ability of an educational system to adapt to external challenges, ensure efficient resource allocation, and generate long-term socio-economic value. A multi-level model of strategic quality management in general secondary education is proposed. The model integrates four key components: institutional capacity, strategic capacity, process management, and qualimetric monitoring. Their interaction forms a comprehensive management framework aimed at achieving sustainable educational outcomes and improving the effectiveness of educational institutions. The model also incorporates elements of strategic management, including long-term planning, resource management, organizational development, and continuous quality improvement. The results of the research confirm that the transition from an administrative control model to an integrated strategic management model based on institutional capacity is a necessary condition for improving the quality of general secondary education in modern conditions.
References
Райчева Л.І., Нестерова К.С. Принцип автономії закладу вищої освіти: можливості, ризики та моделі реалізації. Науковий журнал «Розвиток міста». 2025. Вип. 2. С. 175–180.
Ямполь Ю. В., Поліщук С. В. Критерії ефективності менеджменту якості освіти в закладах загальної середньої освіти. Збірник наукових праць Таврійського національного університету ім. В. І. Вернадського. Серія: «Освіта і менеджмент» (50). 2024. С. 11–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2519-884X-2024-50-11.
Лукіна Т. О. Управління якістю загальної середньої освіти : [посібник]. Кам’янець-Подільський : Кам’янець-Подільський національний університет ім. І. Огієнка, 2020. 296 с.
Волинець Л. Л., Джурило А. П., Єгоров Г. С., Лавриченко Н. М., Локшина О. І. та ін. Забезпечення якості загальної середньої освіти у провідних країнах Європи та США : монографія / за заг. ред. О. І. Локшиної. Київ : Інститут педагогіки НАПН України, 2014. 374 с.
Суворова Л. К. Управління якістю освіти як стратегічний напрям державної політики в Україні. Academy Vision: науковий журнал. 2025. С. 1–12.
Чипорнюк В. В. Current state of educational quality management in higher education and IQMS models. Вісник Житомирського державного університету ім. Івана Франка. 2025. № 1. С. 1–17.
Porter M. E. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York : Free Press, 1980. 396 p. URL: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=195
Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston : Harvard Business School Press, 1996. 322 p.
ДСТУ ISO 9000:2015. Системи управління якістю. Основні положення та словник термінів. Київ : ДП «УкрНДНЦ», 2016. 45 с.
Єльникова Г. В., Рябова З.В. Моніторинг як ефективний засіб оцінювання якості загальної середньої освіти в навчальному закладі. Культура народов Причерноморья. 2007. № 115, Т. 1. С. 35-43.
OECD. Education Policy Outlook 2019: Working Together to Help Students Achieve their Potential. Paris: OECD Publishing. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/2b8ad56e-en
Hanushek E., Woessmann L.The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. MIT Press. 2015. URL: https://hanushek.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Hanushek%2BWoessmann%202020%20Education_knowledge%20capital_and_economic%20growth.pdf
Bush T. School leadership and management in disruptive times. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2020. Vol. 48(6). P. 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220932412
Harvey L., Green D. Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1993. Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 9–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. URL: https://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/40090/1/102.Christopher%20Pollitt.pdf
Raicheva L. I., Nesterova K. S. (2025) Pryntsyp avtonomii zakladu vyshchoi osvity: mozhlyvosti, ryzyky ta modeli realizatsii [The principle of autonomy of higher education institutions: opportunities, risks and models of implementation]. Rozvytok mista – City Development, vol. 2, pp. 175–180. (in Ukrainian)
Yampol Yu. V., Polishchuk S. V. (2024) Kryterii efektyvnosti menedzhmentu yakosti osvity v zakladakh zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Criteria of effectiveness of education quality management in general secondary education institutions]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Tavriiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Osvita i menedzhment, vol. 50, pp. 11–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2519-884X-2024-50-11(in Ukrainian)
Lukina T. O. (2020) Upravlinnia yakistiu zahalnoi serednoi osvity [Quality management of general secondary education]. Kamianets-Podilskyi: Kamianets-Podilskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. I. Ohiienka, 296 p. (in Ukrainian)
Volynets L. L., Dzhurylo A. P., Yehorov H. S., Lavrychenko N. M., Lokshyna O. I. et al. (2014) Zabezpechennia yakosti zahalnoi serednoi osvity u providnykh krainakh Yevropy ta SShA [Quality assurance of general secondary education in leading European countries and the USA]. Kyiv: Instytut pedahohiky NAPN Ukrainy, 374 p. (in Ukrainian)
Suvorova L. K. (2025) Upravlinnia yakistiu osvity yak stratehichnyi napriam derzhavnoi polityky v Ukraini [Education quality management as a strategic direction of state policy in Ukraine]. Academy Vision, pp. 1–12. (in Ukrainian)
Chyporniuk V. V. (2025) Current state of educational quality management in higher education and IQMS models [Current state of educational quality management in higher education and IQMS models]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka, no. 1, pp. 1–17. (in Ukrainian)
Porter M. E. (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press, 396 p. Available at: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=195
Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. (1996) The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 322 p.
DSTU ISO 9000:2015 (2016) Systemy upravlinnia yakistiu. Osnovni polozhennia ta slovnyk terminiv [Quality management systems. Fundamentals and vocabulary]. Kyiv: DP «UkrNDNTs», 45 p. (in Ukrainian)
Yelnykova H. V., Riabova Z. V. (2007) Monitorynh yak efektyvnyi zasib otsiniuvannia yakosti zahalnoi serednoi osvity v navchalnomu zakladi [Monitoring as an effective tool for assessing the quality of general secondary education in an educational institution]. Kultura narodov Prichernomoria, vol. 1, no. 115, pp. 35–43. (in Ukrainian)
OECD (2019) Education Policy Outlook 2019: Working Together to Help Students Achieve their Potential. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/2b8ad56e-en
Hanushek E., Woessmann L. (2015) The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. MIT Press. Available at: https://hanushek.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Hanushek%2BWoessmann%202020%20Education_knowledge%20capital_and_economic%20growth.pdf
Bush T. (2020) School leadership and management in disruptive times. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 48(6), pp. 873–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220932412
Harvey L., Green D. Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1993. Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 9–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. (2017) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/40090/1/102.Christopher%20Pollitt.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Лариса Райчева
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
