FORMATION OF A KPI SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AGRIBUSINESS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2026-3-14

Keywords:

agribusiness, social responsibility, key performance indicators, KPI, rural development, sustainable development, ESG, stakeholder engagement

Abstract

The article substantiates a system of key performance indicators (KPIs) for assessing agribusiness social responsibility in the context of rural development. The relevance of the study is determined by the influence of agricultural enterprises on employment, local budgets, natural resources, and rural communities, as well as by the need to adapt ESG and sustainability assessment approaches to the sectoral and territorial characteristics of agribusiness. The purpose of the study is to develop a KPI system and a methodological approach to evaluating social responsibility performance and the contribution of agricultural enterprises to rural development. The research is based on the generalization and comparative analysis of scientific approaches, international sustainability standards, and reporting frameworks, together with the systematization of indicators relevant to agribusiness and its stakeholders. The methodology includes normalization of heterogeneous indicators to a scale from 0 to 1, calculation of integrated scores for individual blocks, and their aggregation into an overall social responsibility performance index. The assessment system comprises five blocks: social, economic, environmental, stakeholder, and institutional. Each block includes five indicators, resulting in 25 KPIs. A model calculation based on conditional data demonstrates KPI normalization, calculation of block scores, and determination of the integrated index. The resulting value of 0.74 corresponds to a high level according to the proposed five-level interpretation scale and is used only to illustrate the calculation procedure, not to characterize a specific enterprise. The practical significance of the approach lies in its potential use for monitoring social responsibility performance, comparing assessment blocks and enterprises of different scales, identifying areas that require improvement, and supporting management decisions related to rural communities. Further research should focus on empirical testing using actual data from agricultural enterprises, refinement of weighting coefficients, and substantiation of normative or target normalization thresholds.

References

Bowen H. R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York : Harper & Brothers, 1953. 276 p.

Carroll A. B. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons. 1991. Vol. 34(4). P. 39–48.

Freeman R. E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston : Pitman, 1984. 276 p.

Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford : Capstone Publishing, 1997. 402 p.

ISO 26000:2010. Guidance on Social Responsibility. Geneva : International Organization for Standardization, 2010.

United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York : United Nations, 2015.

Global Reporting Initiative. GRI Standards. Amsterdam : GRI, 2025.

European Commission. Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Brussels, 2022.

European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Brussels, 2023.

Грішнова О. А. Соціальна відповідальність бізнесу: сутність, значення та стратегічні напрями розвитку в Україні. Україна: аспекти праці. 2010. № 7. С. 3–8.

Колот А. М. Соціальна відповідальність: теорія і практика розвитку: монографія. Київ : КНЕУ, 2012. 501 с.

Колот А. М., Грішнова О. А. Соціальна відповідальність: навчальний посібник. Київ : КНЕУ, 2015. 519 с.

Новак-Каляєва Л. М. Соціальна відповідальність бізнесу: теоретичні аспекти та практика реалізації. Львів : ЛРІДУ НАДУ, 2013. 328 с.

Зіновчук Н. В. Соціальна відповідальність аграрного бізнесу в умовах сталого розвитку. Економіка АПК. 2018. № 1. С. 68–75.

Шпикуляк О. Г., Білокінна І. Д. Соціальна відповідальність аграрного бізнесу: сучасні тенденції та перспективи розвитку. Економіка АПК. 2020. № 5. С. 73–82.

Малік М. Й., Шпикуляк О. Г. Інституційні засади розвитку аграрного підприємництва в Україні. Економіка АПК. 2021. № 4. С. 6–17.

Саблук П. Т. Розвиток сільських територій в умовах трансформації аграрного сектору. Економіка АПК. 2019. № 6. С. 5–15.

Лупенко Ю. О. Сталий розвиток аграрного сектору України. Економіка АПК. 2020. № 7. С. 5–14.

Бородіна О. М. Соціально-економічний розвиток сільських територій: сучасні виклики та перспективи. Економіка України. 2021. № 4. С. 67–82.

CSR Ukraine. Каталог практик корпоративної соціальної відповідальності в Україні. Київ, 2023.

УКАБ. Аграрний сектор України: аналітичний звіт. Київ, 2024.

EBA. CSR Index 2023. Kyiv : European Business Association, 2023.

IFC. ESG Handbook for Agribusiness. Washington, DC : International Finance Corporation, 2023.

EBRD. Sustainability and ESG Reporting Guidelines. London : European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2023.

SASB Standards. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. New York, 2023.

Патика Н. І., Булавка О. Г. Стратегічні орієнтири та пріоритетні напрями сталого розвитку сільських громад і територій в Україні в умовах децентралізації влади. Економіка АПК. 2021. Т. 28, № 8. С. 91–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202108091.

Patyka N., Sokolova A., Movchaniuk A., Sysoieva I., Khirivskyi R. Ukraine’s rural areas in the conditions of decentralization and local self-government reform: challenges and prospects. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal. 2023. Vol. 9, No. 3. P. 266–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.12.

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

ISO 26000:2010. (2010). Guidance on Social Responsibility. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2025). GRI Standards. Amsterdam: GRI.

European Commission. (2022). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Brussels.

European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. (2023). European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Brussels.

Hrishnova, O. A. (2010). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: sutnist, znachennia ta stratehichni napriamy rozvytku v Ukraini [Corporate social responsibility: essence, significance and strategic directions of development in Ukraine]. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi [Ukraine: Aspects of Labor], (7), 3–8. [in Ukrainian].

Kolot, A. M. (2012). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist: teoriia i praktyка rozvytku [Social responsibility: theory and practice of development]: monohrafiia. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].

Kolot, A. M., & Hrishnova, O. A. (2015). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist [Social responsibility]: navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].

Novak-Kaliaieva, L. M. (2013). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: teoretychni aspekty ta praktyka realizatsii [Corporate social responsibility: theoretical aspects and practice of implementation]. Lviv: LRIDU NADU. [in Ukrainian].

Zinovchuk, N. V. (2018). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist ahrarnoho biznesu v umovakh staloho rozvytku [Social responsibility of agrarian business in conditions of sustainable development]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of APK], (1), 68–75. [in Ukrainian].

Shpykuliak, O. H., & Bilokinna, I. D. (2020). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist ahrarnoho biznesu: suchasni tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Social responsibility of agrarian business: current trends and prospects of development]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of APK], (5), 73–82. [in Ukrainian].

Malik, M. I., & Shpykuliak, O. H. (2021). Instytutsiini zasady rozvytku ahrarnoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini [Institutional foundations of agricultural entrepreneurship development in Ukraine]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of APK], (4), 6–17. [in Ukrainian].

Sabluk, P. T. (2019). Rozvytok silskykh terytorii v umovakh transformatsii ahrarnoho sektoru [Development of rural areas under conditions of transformation of the agrarian sector]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of APK], (6), 5–15. [in Ukrainian].

Lupenko, Yu. O. (2020). Stalyi rozvytok ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky Ukraini [Sustainable development of the agricultural sector of the economy of Ukraine]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of APK], (7), 5–14. [in Ukrainian].

Borodina, O. M. (2021). Sotsialno-ekonomichnyi rozvytok silskykh terytorii: suchasni vyklyky ta perspektyvy [Socio-economic development of rural areas: modern challenges and prospects]. Ekonomika Ukrainy [Economy of Ukraine], (4), 67–82. [in Ukrainian].

CSR Ukraine. (2023). Kataloh praktyk korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti v Ukraini [Catalogue of CSR practices in Ukraine]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

UCAB. (2024). Ahrarnyi sektor Ukrainy: analitychnyi zvit [Agricultural sector of Ukraine: analytical report]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

EBA. (2023). CSR Index 2023. Kyiv: European Business Association.

IFC. (2023). ESG Handbook for Agribusiness. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.

EBRD. (2023). Sustainability and ESG Reporting Guidelines. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

SASB Standards. (2023). Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. New York.

Patyka, N. I., & Bulavka, O. H. (2021). Stratehichni oriientyry ta priorytetni napriamy staloho rozvytku silskykh hromad i terytorii v Ukraini v umovakh detsentralizatsii vlady [Strategic guidelines and priority directions for sustainable development of rural communities and territories in Ukraine in the context of power decentralization]. Ekonomika APK [Economy of APK], 28(8), 91–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202108091. [in Ukrainian]

Patyka, N., Sokolova, A., Movchaniuk, A., Sysoieva, I., & Khirivskyi, R. (2023). Ukraine’s rural areas in the conditions of decentralization and local self-government reform: challenges and prospects. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 9(3), 266–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.12.

Published

27.10.2026

How to Cite

Prokapovych, O. (2026). FORMATION OF A KPI SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AGRIBUSINESS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. Scientific Journal of Yuriy Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University. Economics, (3), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2026-3-14