PECULIARITIES OF THE APPLICATION OF DECISIONS IN TAX CASES OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2025-12.01

Keywords:

tax law; case law of the EU Court; tax consultations; application of law; interpretation of law; Republic of Poland

Abstract

The article studies the regulatory consolidation of the procedure for applying decisions in tax disputes of the European Court of Justice in the Republic of Poland. The author determined that the decision of the EU Court is part of EU law, which must be complied with by both member states and candidate states prior to accession. After acquiring the status of a candidate country for accession, the problem of applying the decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU became relevant for Ukraine. An analysis of the experience of resolving this issue by member states, including the Republic of Poland, should accelerate Ukraine’s European integration. It has been established that in the Republic of Poland the case law of the European Court of Justice is not an independent source of law, and there is also no separate law regulating the procedure for the application and enforcement of decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU. This issue is regulated by special norms of industry legislation. Regarding decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU in tax cases – special norms of the Tax Ordinance. In fact, the application of decisions in tax disputes of the Court of Justice of the EU is reduced to taking into account the position of the Court of Justice of the EU when issuing general tax consultations by the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Poland, as well as for the resumption of court proceedings in tax cases. The issuance of general tax consultations is carried out on the basis of current tax legislation, taking into account the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal, administrative courts of the Republic of Poland and the Court of Justice of the EU. The reopening of proceedings takes place not only as a result of a court decision in a Polish case, but even if the decision of the Court of Justice of the EU in the case was made in response to a request sent by another Member State. It has been determined that the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU is one of the grounds for changing the interpretations provided by the Minister of Finance if he considers them incorrect. In the case of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU, as in the case of the decisions of the Constitutional Tribunal, their content means that the Minister of Finance must change his explanations. It has been proven that the impact of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU on tax authorities and their interpretation of tax rules largely depends on the type and timing of the decision made by it. Thus, on the one hand, there is a complete disregard by the tax authorities of the classical practice of the Court of Justice of the EU and the conclusions arising from it, on the other hand, this is the only court that can quickly and effectively change the position of the Polish tax authorities.

References

Babin, I. (2020). Features of the Application of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by Ukrainian Courts in Tax Cases. DANUBE. Vol. 11, No.1, pp.75–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0005.

Zoll, F., Południak-Gierz, K., Bańczyk, W. (2022). The Struggle on Implementation of the Acquis Communautaire into Polish Civil Code. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burgerlijk Recht. Nr 20. pp. 154–159.

Jabłoński, M., Jarosz-Żukowska, S. (2015). Kontrola konstytucyjności prawa pochodnego UE w trybie skargi konstytucyjnej i pytań prawnych. [в:] Jabłoński M., Jarosz-Żukowska S. (red.). Zasada pierwszeństwa prawa Unii Europejskiej w praktyce działania organów władzy publicznej RP. Wrocław. pp. 55–79.

Zoll, F., Południak-Gierz, K., Bańczyk, W. (2022). Pierwszeństwo prawa UE a orzecznictwo Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Ostatnie zmiany w świetle orzecznictwa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. 37 p.

Case C-791/19, Commission v Poland [2021] ECLI:EU:C: 2021:596.

Case C- C-192/18, Commission v Poland [2019] ECLI:EU:C: 2019:924.

Polskie Sprawy Podatkowe przed TSUE: rozstrzygnięcia, pełnomocnicy i kancelarie. Retrieved from: https://www.prawo.pl/podatki/sukcesy-w-sprawach-podatkowych-przed-tsue-polskich-pelnomocnikow,521383.html.

Ustawa z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. – Ordynacja podatkowa. Dz.U. z 2005 r., Nr 8, poz. 60 ze zm.

Adamiak, B., Borkowski, J., Mastalski, R., Zubrzycki, J. (2011). Ordynacja podatkowa. Komentarz. 1404p.

Antonów, D. (2011). Orzecznictwo Trybunału Sprawiedliwości w procesie stosowania prawa przez organy podatkowe. [в:] Studia Finansowoprawne. Wrocław: Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Uniwersytet Wrocławski. Wydział Prawa Administracji i Ekonomii. pp. 9–25.

Jakubiak, T., Wojtczak, V., Zawal-Kubiak, H, (2009). Oceny prawne wyrażone w orzecznictwie a wydanie interpretacji indywidualnych. Przegląd Podatkowy. Nr 10. Pp. 34–51.

Case C-453/00, Kühne & Heitz [2004] ECLI:EU:C: 2004:17.

Brzeziński, B., Lasiński-Sulecki, K. (2009). Znaczenie orzecznictwa ETS dla polskiej praktyki podatkowej. Przegląd Podatkowy. Nr 11. Pp. 7–12.

Andrzejewska-Czernek, I. (2010). Wykładnia prawa podatkowego Unii Europejskiej dokonywana przez sądy administracyjne oraz organy administracji podatkowej. Toruński Rocznik Podatkowy. Pp. 89–137.

Рismo Dyrektora Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie z 6 lutego 2009 r., Nr IPPP2/443-1723/08-2/AZ.

Pismo Dyrektora Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie z 14 stycznia 2009 r., Nr IPPP1-443-1982/08- 2/MP.

Рismo DIS w Warszawie z 12 marca 2008 r., Nr IPPP1/443-137/08-2/SM, czy też z 7 lutego 2008 r., Nr IPPP1-443-755/07-2/MP.

Case C-475/07, Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland [2009] ECLI:EU:C: 2009:86.

Іnterpretacja ogólna Ministra Finansów z 22 lutego 2010 r., Nr PL/LM/830/14/BNJ/10/27

Іnterpretacja ogólna Ministra Finansów z 5 marca 2009 r., Nr PK4/801225/ ZAP/09/AP-291

Рismо DIS w Bydgoszczy z 29 września 2009 r., nr ITPP2/443-537/09/MD.

Case C-349/13, Minister Finansów v Oil Trading Poland sp. z.o.o. [2015] ECLI:EU:C: 2015:84.

Interpretacja ogólna Ministra finansów z dnia 1 kwietnia 2016 r. Nr PT3.8101.41.2015.AEW.2016.AMT.141

Case C-319/12, Minister Finansów v MDDP sp. z o.o. Akademia Biznesu, sp. Komandytowa [2013] ECLI:EU:C: 2013:778.

Published

2025-05-22

How to Cite

BABIN, I. (2025). PECULIARITIES OF THE APPLICATION OF DECISIONS IN TAX CASES OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND. Ehrlich’s Journal, (12), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2025-12.01

Issue

Section

Статті