THE ECTHR’S LEGAL POSITION ON THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROHIBITION OF FORCED LABOR AS STANDARDS FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2021-5.03Keywords:
freedom of labor, protection of labor rights, the judgemets of the European Court of Human Rights, prohibition of forced labor, interpretation of fundamental labor rightsAbstract
The article emphasizes that Ukraine is a party to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the ILO Conventions on Forced or Compulsory Labor and the Abolition of Forced Labor. In this regard, Ukraine is obliged to eradicate all forms of forced or compulsory labor in all spheres of life, to prevent forced labor in both the public and private sectors, and to provide effective redress to those whose rights have been violated. It is emphasized that forced labor and trafficking in human beings are not only a gross violation of human rights and employee’s rights, but also the antithesis of decent work. Freedom from forced labor is one of the basic labor rights that should be properly promoted and protected. Analysis of the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights on the prohibition of forced labor will assess the state and prospects for improving the judicial protection of labor rights, their applicability in domestic practice. It is emphasized that the case law of the European Court of Human Rights is an official form of interpretation of fundamental labor rights of every person, enshrined and guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights, which is part of national law and a source of legal regulation and enforcement in Ukraine. As a source of labor law, ECtHR decisions directly affect labor relations, their content, emergence, change or termination, contribute to legal stability and orderly development of the practice of application of the Convention. It is argued that the European Convention on Human Rights contains only the prohibition of forced labor, which in modern economic conditions can not cover all cases of violations of labor rights, the need for protection of which objectively exists. In recent years, there has been a tendency in the activities of the ECtHR to expand the interpretation of the rules of the ECHR in order to protect the rights and interests of the individual. For labor law, the extension of the content of the provisions of the Convention by the European Court of Human Rights is of particular importance, as it allows to increase the range of issues on which it is possible to seek protection of labor rights.
References
ILO says forced labour generates annual profits of $ 150 billion. Iternational labour jrganization. URL: https://www.ilo.org/ global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_243201/lang--en/index.htm
Sohodni svit vidznachaie Mizhnarodnyi den borotby iz rabstvom. URL: https://dsp.gov.ua/sohodni-svit-vidznachaie-mizhnarodnyi-den-borotby-za-skasuvannia-rabstva/
Pavlenko S. O. Suchasnyi stan torhivli liudmy z metoiu trudovoi ekspluatatsii v Ukraini ta sviti. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. № 1. 2021. S. 120–126. URL: http://apnl.dnu.in.ua/1_2021/28.pdf
Global estimates of modern slavery: forced labour and forced marriage / International Labour Organization and Walk Free Foundation. 2017. URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_ 575479.pdf.
OON: Kozhne tretie roboche mistse v Ukraini znyklo cherez viinu. URL: https://suspilne.media/238410-oonkozne-trete-roboce-misce-v-ukraini-zniklo-cerez-vijnu/
Konstantnyi O. V. Praktyka Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny yak dzherelo pravozastosuvannia Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy. Visnyk Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy. 2012. № 1 (137). S. 33–36. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vvsu_2012_1_14
Volokhov O. S. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho Sudu z prav liudyny u systemi dzherel trudovoho prava Ukrainy. Pravove zabezpechennia efektyvnoho vykonannia rishen i zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny : zb. nauk. ct. Mizhnar. nauk.¬-prakt. konf. (Odesa, 15 veresnia 2012 r.) / za red. S. V. Kivalova; NU “OIuA”. Odesa: Feniks, 2012. S. 462-469. URL: http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/9643»
Harashchenko L. P. Praktyka Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny shchodo zakhystu trudovykh prav. Sudova apeliatsiia. 2015. № 2 (39). S. 79–86. http://www.library.univ.kiev.ua/ukr/elcat/new_nonjs/detail.php3?doc_id=1665510&title=%D2%F0%F3%E4&div=0&source=1&yearFst=
Klietsova N. V., Kazban A. V. Vykorystannia riznykh metodiv naukovykh doslidzhen pid chas analizu sprav YeSPL v sferi porushennia trudovoho zakonodavstva. Pryvatne ta publichne pravo. 2020. № 2. S. 118–124. URL: http://pp-law.in.ua/archive/2_2020/25.pdf
Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod: mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 04.11.1950 r. iz zmin. № ETS N 005 / Rada Yevropy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text
Sprava “Shtummer protyv Avstryy” (Stummer v. Austria) (Zaiava № 37452/02) Postanova vid 7.07.2011: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: http://www.echr.ru/documents/doc/70058030/70058030.htm
Sprava “Karlkhaints Shmidt proty Nimechchyny” (Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany) (Zaiava № 13580/88) vid 18.07.94: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57880%22]}
Pro prymusovu chy oboviazkovu pratsiu: Konventsiia MOP vid 28 chervnia 1930 r. № 29 / Konventsiia, mizhnarodnyi dokument. № 29. URL: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/993_136
Sprava “Seliaden (Siliadin) proty Frantsii” (Zaiava № 73316/01) vid 26.05.2005: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: http://lawyer.khpg.org/1/1255676674
Sprava “Hratsiani-Veiss (Graziani-Weiss) proty Avstrii” (Zaiava № 31950/06): Postanova vid 18.10.2011 № 31950/06: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: http://docs.pravo.ru/document/view/32801067/
Pro skasuvannia prymusovoi pratsi: Konventsiia MOP vid 25 chervnia 1957 r. № 105 / Konventsiia, mizhnarodnyi dokument. № 105. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/993_013#Text
Sprava “Chovduri ta inshi proty Hretsii” (Zaiava № 21884/15) vid 30.03.2017: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/chowdury-and-others-v-greece-0_en
Sprava “Vnuchko proty Ukrainy” (Zaiava № 1198/04) vid 14.12.2006: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_148#Text
Sprava “Rantsev proty Kipra i rosii” (Zaiava № 25965/04) vid 07.01.2010: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/rantsev-v-cyprus-and-russia-application-no-2596504_en
Pati R. “States” Positive Obligations with Respect to Human Trafficking: The European Court of Human Rights Breaks New Ground in Rantsev v. Cyprus & Russia. Boston University International Law Journal. 2011. № 1. P. 79–142. URL: https://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/international/documents/pati_79-142.pdf
Sprava “Popov proty Ukrainy” (Zaiava № 23892/03) vid 14.12.2006: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_152
Na foni pandemii roste kilkist zhertv torhivli liudmy. URL: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2020/07/1382961
Pro vnesennia zminy do statti 149 Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy shchodo pryvedennia u vidpovidnist z mizhnarodnymy standartamy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 06.09.2018 r. № 2539-VIII / Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2539-19#Text
Sprava “Khitos proty Hretsii” (Zaiava № № 51637/12) Postanova vid 4.06.2015: Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny / YeSPL. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=446104#jiYia-4TwenZDxxKC