THE IDEA OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE 1977 ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2025-14.05

Keywords:

international humanitarian law (IHL), international human rights law (IHRL), Additional Protocol I, Additional Protocol II, humanisation, convergence of law, armed conflict, war, principle of distinction, judicial guarantees, Martens’ reservation, protection of the civilian population, human rights

Abstract

The article examines how the 1977 Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions became a catalyst for the systematic integration of human rights into the law of armed conflict, causing a paradigm shift from a state-centric system to an individual-oriented legal regime. The study highlights that, in response to the shortcomings of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, in particular the insufficient regulation of methods of warfare and non-international armed conflicts, the Protocols established a new philosophy of protection based on the idea of the inalienability of human dignity. It was found that Additional Protocol I not only codified key principles (distinction, proportionality) but also incorporated human rights concepts, extending the concept of international conflict to national liberation wars. The central element of this humanization was Article 75, which functions as a “bill of rights” in IHL, establishing minimum standards of humane treatment and comprehensive judicial guarantees borrowed from international human rights law. At the same time, Additional Protocol II made a historic breakthrough by creating the first detailed legal regime for non-international armed conflicts in history. It significantly expanded the minimal protection provided by the general Article 3, incorporating into the law of internal conflicts the core of inalienable human rights, including fundamental guarantees (Article 4) and the right to a fair trial (Article 6). The results of the study show that this human rights legacy has been consolidated by the practice of ad hoc international tribunals and the International Court of Justice, which have confirmed the customary nature of many norms and the doctrine of parallel application of IHL and ICCPR. Thus, the 1977 Additional Protocols irreversibly “humanised” the law of war, establishing that the protection of the dignity and rights of the individual is a central element of IHL, which is crucial for modern armed conflicts.

References

Meron T. The Humanization of Humanitarian Law. American Journal of International Law. 2000. Vol. 94 (2). P. 239–278.

Sassòli M., Bouvier A. A., Quintin A. How Does Law Protect in War? 3rd ed. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2011. 1492 p. URL: https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/0973-how-does-law-protect-war (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Alexander A. International Humanitarian Law, Postcolonialism and the 1977 Geneva Protocol I. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 2015. Vol. 16 (1). P. 171–197.

Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights (Resolution XXIII, Human rights in armed conflicts): A/CONF.32/41 / International Conference on Human Rights, 13 May 1968. 21 p. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/219983 (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) of 8 June 1977. United Nations, Treaty Series. Vol. 1125, 17512. URL: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201125/volume-1125-I-17512-English.pdf (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Cassese A. The Self-Determination of Peoples. The Rights of Peoples / ed. by J. Crawford. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1988. P. 92–113. URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/5299 (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Cassese A. The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky? European Journal of International Law. 2000. Vol. 11 (1). P. 187–216. URL: https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/11/1/187/384288 (дата звернення: 02.09.2025).

Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 / ed. by Y. Sandoz, C. Swinarski, B. Zimmermann. Geneva : ICRC ; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987. 1648 p. URL: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/commentary (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Droege C. The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review. 2007. Vol. 40 (2). P. 310–355. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/israel-law-review/article/interplay-between-international-humanitarian-law-and-international-human-rightslaw-in-situations-of-armed-conflict/439815F832626F7D8447833C148B1C8D (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Gardam J.G. Women, Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross. 1998. No. 324. P. 421–432. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-review-of-the-red-cross/article/women-human-rights-and-international-humanitarian-law/2D6E955E9E4A9CF05607316A74B8161A (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II) of 8 June 1977. United Nations, Treaty Series. Vol. 1125, 17513. URL: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201125/volume-1125-I-17513-English.pdf (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Meron T. The Case for War Crimes Trials in Yugoslavia. Foreign Affairs. 1993. Vol. 72 (3). P. 122–135. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/yugoslavia/1993-06-01/case-war-crimes-trials-yugoslavia (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić : Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction / Appeals Chamber, ICTY, 2 October 1995. URL: https://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Prosecutor v. Zoran Kupreškić et al. : Case No. IT-95-16-T, Judgement / Trial Chamber, ICTY, 14 January 2000. URL: https://www.icty.org/x/cases/kupreskic/tjug/en/kup-tj000114e.pdf (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 17 July 1998. United Nations, Treaty Series. Vol. 2187, 38544. URL: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%202187/v2187.pdf (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons : Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996. I.C.J. Reports 1996. P. 226. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/95 (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory : Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004. I.C.J. Reports 2004. P. 136. URL: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/131 (дата звернення: 02.07.2025).

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

LYSYK, V. (2025). THE IDEA OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE 1977 ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS. Ehrlich’s Journal, (14), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2025-14.05

Issue

Section

Статті