SYSTEMIC NATURE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY OF TAX LAW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2025-12.02

Keywords:

tax law; principle of tax law; systemic nature of tax law; legal certainty of tax law; purpose of tax law; new official standard for understanding the constitutionality of tax law in Ukra

Abstract

The article examines the systemic nature of the principle of legal certainty of tax law in general and the specifics of its manifestation in Ukraine under martial law, based on domestic and foreign sources, primarily, regulations, doctrinal approaches of the Venice Commission, case law of the European Court of Human Rights, a special decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, and resolutions of the Administrative Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court. The purpose of the study is to clarify the systemic properties of this principle, mainly the functions and significance of its backbone element, namely, the purpose of the principle of legal (juridical) certainty of tax law. The study focuses on the following tasks: to reveal the meaning of the understanding of the systemic nature of the principle of legal certainty of tax law by the European tradition of law cognition; to analyze the peculiarities of understanding the meaning of this principle in the Ukrainian tax law doctrine under martial law. The author has obtained the following main scientific results: tax law is a procedural system by its nature. Hence, the principle of legal certainty of tax law cannot have a different nature than tax law as a whole. According to the European tradition of tax law, the meaning of the principle of legal certainty of tax law is embodied in its purpose – to find a balance between the public interest of society and the private interest of the taxpayer in respect of the latter’s private property. In Ukraine, under martial law, a similar understanding of the principle of legal certainty of tax law is shared by the national legislator, the Administrative Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court and some representatives of the scientific doctrine of tax law. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine identifies the principle of legal certainty of tax law with the legislative basis of its stability. This is a new challenge to the principle of stability of tax law of Ukraine, which awaits its resolution under martial law.

References

Havrylyuk, R. O. (2014). The nature of tax law: anthroposociocultural approach: Monograph. Chernivtsi: Chernivtsi National University, 636 c.

Kucheryavnko, M. P. (2008). Tax law of Ukraine: Academic course: Textbook. Kyiv: All-Ukrainian Association of Publishers ‘Legal Unity’, 701 с.

The Rule of Law. Report adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th Plenary Session (Venice, 25–26 March 2011) on the basis of comments provided by: Mr Peter Van Dijk (Commissioner, Netherlands), Ms Greta Galler (Commissioner, Switzerland), Mr Geoffrey Jowell (Commissioner, United Kingdom) and Mr Koarlo Tuori (Commissioner, Finland). Law of Ukraine. 2011. № 10. С. 168–184.

The Rule of Law. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106th plenary session (Venice, 11–12 March 2016). Approved by the Committee of Ministers (at the level of their deputies) at the 1263rd meeting (6–7 September 2016). Approved by the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe at its 31st session (19–21 October 2016). Commentary. Glossary. / Translated from English by Serhiy Holovaty. Strasbourg, 18 March 2016, Study No. 711/2013. 164 с.

Bingham, Tom. (2024). The Rule of Law. / Translated from English and edited by S. Holovaty. Kyiv: USAID, 256 с.

Patskurkivskyy, P., Havrylyuk, R. (2024). Sources of The Rule of Law according to the concept of Tom Bingham. Law of Ukraine. № 8. С. 31–45.

Rule of law. Checklist at the national level: case of Ukraine / edited by M. Kozyubra, compilers and commentators: V. Wenger, A. Zayets, E. Zverev, M. Kozyubra, Y. Matveeva, O. Tseliev; Centre for Research on the Rule of Law and its Implementation in the National Practice of Ukraine, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. Kyiv, 2020. 144 с.

Andrusiv, U. B., Fedyk, S. E. (2019). Elements of the principle of legal certainty. Journal of Kyiv University of Law. № 1. С. 19–25.

Pohrebniak, S. P. (2020). Legal positions of the Supreme Court in the context of the rule of law and constitutionalism. Kyiv. Vite. 240 с.

Smith, A. (2001). The Welfare of Nations. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Welfare of Nations. / Translated by O. Vasyliev, M. Mezhevikina, A. Malivskyi. Kyiv: Port-Royal, 722 c.

Baker, P. (2001). Taxation and Human Rights. GITS Review. № 1. P. 3–25.

Baker, P. (2000). Taxation and the European Convention on Human Rights. British Tax Review. № 4. P. 21–47.

Patskurkivskyy, P. S. (2024). Philosophy of EU tax law as a value. In the book: Tax law of the European Union as a value: a collective monograph / R. O. Havrylyuk, P. S. Patskurkivskyy, V. V. Khokhulyak and others; edited by R. O. Havrylyuk. Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University. Р. 19–165.

Patskurkivskyy, P. P. (2021). Legal nature of the evaluative concepts of ‘fairness’, ‘good faith’ and ‘reasonableness’ in the Tax Code of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series ‘Law’. Issue 67. Uzhhorod. P. 79–88.

Patskurkivskyy, P. P. (2023). Fairness and reasonableness of the tax law of Ukraine under martial law. Private and public law. № 3. P. 69–75.

Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 20 March 1952. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_535#Text.

Case of Sporrong and Lönnroth V. Sweden (Application no. 7151/75; 7152/75), 23 September 1982. Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57580%22]}.

Case of Bežanić and Baškarad v. Croatia (Applications nos. 16140/15 and 13322/16). 19 May 2022. Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-217260%22]}.

Lishchyna, I. (2020). Interference with property rights by fiscal measures. Approaches and practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Law of Ukraine. № 5. P. 207–234.

Lishchyna, I. (2020). Interference with property rights by fiscal measures. Approaches and practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Law of Ukraine. № 6. С. 210–233.

Havrylyuk, R. O., Patskurkivskyy, P. S. (2023). Discussion issues of legal certainty of the tax law of Ukraine under martial law. Yurydychna Ukraina. № 10. С. 22–30.

On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Peculiarities of Taxation and Reporting during the Period of Martial Law: Law of Ukraine of 3 March 2022, No. 2118-IX. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2118-20#Text.

Patskurkivskyy, P., Havrylyuk, R. (2022). Russia’s war against Ukraine and domestic public finances. Law of Ukraine. № 3. С. 9–25.

On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine on the Validity of Norms for the Period of Martial Law: Law of Ukraine of 15.03.2022, No. 2120-IX. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2120-20#Text.

On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Improving Legislation for the Period of Martial Law: Law of Ukraine of 24.03.2022, No. 2142-IX. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2142-20#Text.

Havrylyuk, R., Patskurkivskyy, P. (2023). Military matrix of the tax law of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine. № 4. С. 106–123.

Tax Code of Ukraine: The Law of Ukraine. Code of 02.12.2010 No. 2755-VI. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#Text.

Resolution of the Administrative Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court of 19 April 2022 in case No. 816/687/16 (administrative proceedings No. K/9901/33796/20). Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pro_sud/rishennya_sud_palat/palata_19_04_01_2022_816_687_16

Decision of the Second Senate of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the constitutional complaint of Geomax-Resource Limited Liability Company regarding the compliance of a separate provision of the second paragraph of subparagraph 14.1.212 of paragraph 14.1 of Article 14 of the Tax Code of Ukraine with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) as amended by the Law of Ukraine ‘On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Tax Reform’ of 28 December 2014 No. 71-VІІІ. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v003p710-25#Text.

Patskurkivskyy, P. P. (2024). My view on law. Collection of scientific works. Kyiv: Jurinkom Inter, 281 с.

On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of 13.07.2017 No. 2136-VIII. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2136-19#Text.

Published

2025-05-22

How to Cite

DUTCHAK, A. (2025). SYSTEMIC NATURE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY OF TAX LAW. Ehrlich’s Journal, (12), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.32782/ehrlichsjournal-2025-12.02

Issue

Section

Статті